Are we really living in a society where discarded food is more important than the welfare of the poor?

Today, while browsing the Internet, I went on an online forum where I post regularly. This forum, though mainly about the football team I support, also sees various other issues discussed. One thread I viewed was related to homelessness and vagrancy. On there, aside from reading some of the stories of homelessness and near-destitution from a surprisingly high amount of people, I also found out about the Iceland Three for the first time. And I've never felt so disgusted in all my life.

The Iceland Three are Paul May, Jason Chan, and William James, residents of a squat in north London. Back in October last year, the trio climbed over a wall at the back of Iceland - a supermarket chain - in Kentish Town, and took some food from a skip, to the grand value of £33. A member of the public, possibly thinking they were breaking into the store, called the police, who then came and arrested the men.

Initially charged with burglary, the trio were released after spending 19 hours in a police cell. As far as everyone was concerned, that was the end of it. 

However, this week, a statement from the Crown Prosecution Service confirmed that the men would stand trial in a month's time.

A CPS spokesman said on Wednesday: "I can confirm that Jason Chan, William James and Paul May have been charged with being found in or upon enclosed premises, contrary to section 4 of the Vagrancy Act 1824.”

Despite the chief executive of Iceland, Malcolm Walker, publicly stating that “(Iceland) did not call police (and) did not seek prosecution”, the CPS replied by saying: "We feel there is significant public interest in prosecuting these three individuals."

My question is along the lines of the one posed by Mr Walker: How? How is this in the public interest? Why do they believe that it is in the public interest to pursue a case against these three individuals?

Is it in the public interest to make a public display of contempt and callousness, akin to those shown in Dickensian Britain, towards those who are destitute and homeless?

Is it in the public interest to demonise and further ruin the lives of vulnerable people whose only goal that evening was to avoid starvation, by invoking a law created nearly 200 years ago?

Is it in the public interest to deliberately go against the wishes of the business owners, who were happy to let the whole thing slide?

And is it in the public interest to show the nation how discarded, out of date food in a skip, soon to be thrown into a landfill, is more important than human beings who just so happen to be out on the streets?

A year ago, Left Foot Forward revealed how eight million people in the UK are just one missed paycheque away from homelessness. It doesn’t take anything to drive someone into destitution nowadays. And when it happens, don’t expect any favours from the Big Society.

A petition has appeared online calling for Baljit Ublhey, the head of the CPS in London, to intervene in this case.

The campaign states: “It is morally bankrupt and divisive to punish the poor under an antiquated law for feeding themselves with food destined for landfills. We the public do not want to see our money wasted on this prosecution.”

Now, I’m not one for spamming people’s inboxes and feeds with petition signature requests, but this is certainly a case which I believe needs to be publicised. This is an attack not just on the poor and the destitute, but on each and every one who has, at some point, had money problems, and may have even come close to losing their home or livelihood.

And in today’s Britain, that figure is much higher than you think.

Isn't it time we stopped patronising Africa?

Africa, as a continent, has experienced much hardship in the last 130 years, such as colonialism, racism, brutal genocides, dictatorships, war and pillaging of the land for the resources. Some of these things are still happening today. The Western media tends to focus on all these characteristics. However, what the media doesn't tell you is there are also success stories. Many African countries have been coming into their own economically and politically.

People forget that South Africa has successfully hosted a Rugby World Cup and a Football World Cup in its short history as a democratic multi-party state. Other countries, such as Gabon, Botswana, Namibia and Ghana are also showing encouraging signs. A recent Reuters article reported that "Africa withstood the financial crisis better than many predicted, and the region's economic growth is forecast at 4.75 percent in 2010. Next year, half of the world's 10 fastest growing economies are expected to be in Africa."


Why am I writing this article? To dispel the common misconceptions that so many have about Africa. This may seem really banal to some who read this, but a recent poll conducted by Sunshine.co.uk shows that 20% of Brits think it never rains in Africa, 70% think the Sahara is always hot, and 54% think Timbuktu is imaginary. This, I believe, is the tip of the iceberg. Ergo, let me dispel two of the biggest misconceptions.

1) "Africa? Isn't it a country?"

Africa is NOT a country. Pan-Africanism is common in Africa - slightly less in the North where people also feel a strong sense of Arabism and Middle Easternness, but certainly in the Sub-Saharan region - because, in the face of adversity past and present, African people like to express solidarity with one another. One such example is in the 2010 World Cup, when the South African crowd voraciously supported Ghana against Uruguay when it was the sole African team left in the tournament, and booed Luis Suarez (he of the goal-line handball) in the 3rd place playoff. The African way of thinking is: "We may be from different countries but we're all African". However, because one is proud to define oneself by continent as well as country, this does not mean the two can be blurred. I identify myself as Italian, English AND European, for example, but even though Europe has at times shared a common history, claiming that Italian culture and history is the same as French culture, German culture, British culture and Serb culture would seem preposterous to us, and Africans are entitled to feel the same acerbic feelings when someone, in the space of a few words, lumps together every country in Africa, ignoring the history, culture and existence of each.

2) "Africa is a mess! Everyone is starving, dying of AIDS or killing each other there!"

This is incredibly wrong and ignorant. Africa is NOT a barren wasteland where everybody's malnourished, dying in the street and covered in flies. It baffles and disgusts me how people my age or older (physically, obviously not mentally) ask me "Africa? Isn't everyone starving there?" or "Be careful when you go to Africa, you'll catch AIDS!". And yes, I have been asked. One wouldn't say "North America is a wasteland" or "Asia is a big mess". There are richer countries and there are poorer countries. There are big prosperous cities, there are small quiet towns and there are slums. Some regions are at war and others aren't. Africa is just as varied, economically, politically, and culturally, as any other continent.

The Band-Aid song "Do They Know It's Christmas Time" is to blame for putting these preposterous ideas into people's heads. If one imagines how much tourism has been lost by people not even considering Africa as a holiday destination, as well as charity money ending up in the wrong hands, and just the sheer indignification of it all for its people, it's been more of a bane than a blessing - particularly when the same song with the same patronising, misleading lyrics has been released three times, the latest in 2004, just so the sons and daughters of those who witnessed Live Aid can also learn that Africa is a place to be avoided and derided.

You know it's telling when Birhan Woldu, the famous child from Live Aid, openly opposes food aid and charity. In a 2009 Telegraph article, she says: "As well as being demeaning to our dignity, my education has taught me that constantly shipping food is costly, uneconomic, and can encourage dependency", and: "we know our vulnerabilities. We are a proud people... let us grow our own food and help manage our own systems so we are not hit so hard when the next drought or flood comes."

(Furthermore, it does rain in Africa. If anyone saw the 2010 World Cup in SA, it rained during several matches. The Sahara is freezing at night, because low humidity and lack of cloud cover allow most of the day's heat to radiate back into space. And Timbuktu is in Mali.)


A brilliant satire on Lee Nelson's Well Good Show, of how young adults, and by extension, the general public, view Africa. This is a must-watch.

If you truly want to help Africa, book a flight to Johannesburg, Accra or Addis Ababa, book a hotel, rent a car, and go there on holiday. Visit the restaurants, buy curio, and visit the attractions. Yes, some areas are to be avoided, but I'm sure one doesn't need to be told where the no-go areas are in London or Los Angeles. By treating African nations, and its citizens, as we would any other country in the world, we are giving so much more than simply popping a cheque in the post, or a coin in a charity bucket, and getting on with our day. Not that I'm saying stop giving to charity, but in the mid to long-term, assuming that Africa is a place where "there won't be snow... this Christmas time, the only gift they'll get this year is life, where nothing ever grows, no rain, no rivers flow" is at best undignifying and at worst downright dangerous and stifling to Africa's development. Africa is home to so many beautiful countries, friendly proud people, fantastic food, rich culture, stunning attractions and some of the greatest flora and fauna in the world, so isn't it time we stopped patronising it?